Nikon's 28-400mm Superzoom Tested in the Dolomites: One Lens to Rule Your Hiking Kit?

Nikon's 28-400mm Superzoom Tested in the Dolomites: One Lens to Rule Your Hiking Kit?

The dream for any photographer who shoots on foot is simple: one lens that covers everything, weighs nothing, and doesn’t make you choose between a wide establishing shot and a compressed telephoto pull. I’ve spent years chasing that setup on a budget, testing every superzoom I can get my hands on, and the tradeoffs are always the same. You gain range, you lose sharpness. You gain convenience, you lose speed. So when a new lens promises 28mm to 400mm in a single barrel, I pay attention, but I also stay skeptical until someone actually takes it somewhere that matters.

Can a Budget Superzoom Actually Deliver Print-Quality Shots? Here's What Nigel Danson Found Out

Can a Budget Superzoom Actually Deliver Print-Quality Shots? Here's What Nigel Danson Found Out

I’ve always had a complicated relationship with superzoom lenses. On paper, a 24-200mm range sounds like the answer to every “what lens should I bring?” argument I’ve ever had with myself at the trailhead. In practice, I’ve tested enough of these lenses to fill two rows of my comparison spreadsheet, and the results are almost always the same story: great convenience, soft edges, and print sizes that top out around 11x14 before you start making excuses.